DGMed ECT Portal
TR EN

Literature Map

How the 2,820 publications in the oncology corpus are distributed across 22 application areas and five study-type bands. The map shows how far an area has advanced in the literature; it does not indicate treatment suitability for any individual patient.

2,820publications
877clinical publications
127randomized, review, guideline
22application areas
1areas with broader clinical literature
387registry records322 ClinicalTrials.gov + 65 other

“Clinical publication” covers primary clinical studies, case series and case reports, 31% of the oncology corpus. 322 registry records come from a ClinicalTrials.gov export and 65 from other registries; a record count is not a study count. What each figure counts is set out under How to Read the Numbers at the foot of the page.

Maturity Matrix

Rows are application areas, columns are study-type bands; bubble area is proportional to the publication count. 22 areas, sorted by clinical strength. The ratio beside a badge is the number of records entering the threshold over the total in the area; for areas that are not human oncology indications the second line names the kind of area rather than the tissue group.

15%Broader clinical literature
627%Early clinical literature
1568%Exploratory literature

Each area is counted at its electrochemotherapy literature maturity; where there are no electrochemotherapy records the first scored method is used. The tier thresholds: thresholds behind the area badges.

22 areas shown

Application area RCT · review · guidelineClinical studyCase series · reportPreclinicalReview · technical · other Total
Pancreatic CancerDeep Organ TumoursECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 3/34IRE: Broader clinical literaturethreshold 56/229 24114186256 274
Prostate & Urological TumoursUrogynaecological TumoursECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 2/11IRE: Broader clinical literaturethreshold 37/117 2160113129 152
General Principles & BiophysicsBasic science, method and deviceECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 8/245IRE: Preclinical literaturethreshold 17/211 16535683211 968
Skin & Cutaneous TumoursSkin & Superficial TumoursECT: Broader clinical literaturethreshold 27/173IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 1/5 1574503041 210
Liver TumoursDeep Organ TumoursECT: Early clinical literaturethreshold 13/47IRE: Broader clinical literaturethreshold 60/203 14932811541 291
Malignant MelanomaSkin & Superficial TumoursECT: Early clinical literaturethreshold 19/124IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/6 955257727 193
Head & Neck TumoursHead, Neck & OrbitECT: Early clinical literaturethreshold 12/63IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/6 728151116 77
Vascular MalformationsBenign clinical applicationECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 2/7 616907 38
Vulvar CancerUrogynaecological TumoursECT: Early clinical literaturethreshold 10/29IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/1 318424 31
Breast CancerDeep Organ TumoursECT: Early clinical literaturethreshold 11/87IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 1/8 236125317 120
Kaposi SarcomaSkin & Superficial TumoursECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 4/22 210615 24
Colorectal CancerDeep Organ TumoursECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 4/24IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/8 287267 50
CholangiocarcinomaDeep Organ TumoursECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/4IRE: Early clinical literaturethreshold 7/17 27664 25
Devices & Clinical TrialsBasic science, method and deviceECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/4IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/5 2401419 39
Electrochemotherapy in Metastatic DiseaseSpecial IndicationsECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/13IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/7 15566 23
Oesophageal & Upper Gastrointestinal TumoursDeep Organ TumoursECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 1/2IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/1 14110 7
Bone & Soft Tissue SarcomasMusculoskeletal & CNSECT: Early clinical literaturethreshold 8/39IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 3/13 011142712 64
Lung & Peribronchial TumoursDeep Organ TumoursECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 1/4IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 2/11 031122 18
Veterinary OncologyVeterinary oncologyECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 2/121IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/4 012711118 157
Brain TumoursMusculoskeletal & CNSECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 1/7IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 2/30 002369 47
Endometrial CancerUrogynaecological TumoursIRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/2 00110 2
Ovarian TumoursUrogynaecological TumoursECT: Exploratory literaturethreshold 0/7IRE: Exploratory literaturethreshold 1/2 00091 10

Bubble size, publication count: 125100683

Study-type band, count in the corpus: RCT · review · guideline 127Clinical study 600Case series · report 247Preclinical 1,314Review · technical · other 532

Randomized Trials, Systematic Reviews and Guidelines

These 127 records are selected by publication type: randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, guidelines and consensus documents. Publication type alone does not mean clinical outcome. 6 study protocols that report no results yet and 1 conference abstract are not in the list below (they remain searchable in the library); in 11 of the 120 listed articles electroporation is background rather than the intervention under study, and 44 of the 127 records pass the portal's eligibility check. Patient numbers, response, survival and risk-of-bias appraisal do not appear in this portal. Newest first; click a title for the citation and full abstract.

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2026

Altamura et al · International Journal of Clinical Practice

General Principles & Biophysics · ECT

Background Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a nonthermal locoregional treatment that enhances cytotoxic drug uptake through reversible electroporation and is increasingly used across different…

Guideline / Consensus 2026

Stabuc et al · J Vis Exp

Vascular Malformations · Electrosclerotherapy

Bleomycin electrosclerotherapy (BEST) is an emerging, minimally invasive treatment for treating slow-flow vascular malformations. Following intralesional administration of bleomycin…

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2026

Gehr et al · Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

Vascular Malformations · Electrosclerotherapy

Purpose: To review the available evidence on the effectiveness and safety of bleomycin electrosclerotherapy (BEST) for slow-flow vascular malformations. Materials and methods: A systematic…

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2026

Formstone et al · Eur Radiol

General Principles & Biophysics · ECT

Objectives: To systematically review the available evidence on electrochemotherapy (ECT) in pediatric patients, focusing on indications, treatment parameters, efficacy, and safety…

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2026

Iqbal et al · Cureus

Liver Tumours · IRE

The aim of this study was to systematically pool all direct comparative evidence from two-arm studies comparing irreversible electroporation (IRE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for…

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2026

Mariussi · Einstein (Sao Paulo)

Pancreatic Cancer · IRE

Objective The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of percutaneous irreversible electroporation combined with immunotherapy compared with irreversible…

Guideline / Consensus 2026

Persico et al · JDReAM

Liver Tumours · Undetermined

The new therapeutic options now available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have made their assessment more complex, especially due to the different stages of liver cirrhosis…

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2026

Pallas · Liver Int

Cholangiocarcinoma · Other EP

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary liver cancer and is being diagnosed with increasing frequency worldwide. We performed a systematic review on radiofrequency (RFA)…

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2025

Rompianesi et al · Cancers (Basel)

Pancreatic Cancer · ECT

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most difficult cancers to treat, with a dismal 5-year survival rate of only 8-10%. This challenging prognosis highlights…

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2025

Vickars et al · Cureus

Malignant Melanoma · ECT

Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is a locoregional cancer treatment primarily used in the palliative management of cutaneous metastases from malignant melanoma. However, its clinical…

Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis 2025

Cribbs · PLoS One

Liver Tumours · IRE

Background: Locoregional treatments for early-stage unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are widely used, with irreversible electroporation (IRE) and transarterial chemoembolization…

Randomized Clinical Trial 2025

Tahvildari et al · Int J Cancer Manag

Breast Cancer · ECT

Background: Skin metastases occur in 5% - 30% of breast cancer patients, highlighting the need for effective treatments. Electrochemotherapy, which combines electric pulses with…

How to Read the Numbers

The portal is not a live literature search: it is an archive of publications gathered, downloaded and resolved to their citation data. The data version at the foot of every page names the date it belongs to.

The figures used across the site
FigureWhat it countsWhat it leaves out
2,820
oncology corpus
Tumour treatment applications; 22 application areas.The non-oncological areas: DNA Vaccination by Electroporation, Cardiac Pulsed-Field Ablation, Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field (nsPEF) and Non-Oncological Electroporation.
3,056
extended electroporation corpus
The oncology corpus plus non-oncological electroporation applications; 26 areas.Neighbouring technologies that are not electroporation, device clearances and assessment documents.
877
clinical publications
Primary clinical studies, case series and case reports as assigned by the automatic study-type classification. 830 are human, 37 animal-model and 10 carry no determined model; 785 are journal articles, the rest conference abstracts, editorials, preprints and protocols. 235 of them enter the maturity threshold calculation.Systematic reviews, guidelines and preclinical publications.
355
records feeding the badges
Records whose classification agrees with their own text and with the external index record. Across the whole extended corpus 402 records meet the condition; the badges of the non-oncological areas are computed from the difference.Records that conflict or carry insufficient data; they appear in the library but affect no badge.

The literature map, the application area pages and the anatomical explorer count the oncology corpus; the research library and the mechanism cross-matrix count the extended corpus. Neighbouring technologies and clearance and assessment documents enter no publication count; they stand with their own figures on Neighbouring Technologies and Clearance and Assessment Documents.

Where the labels come from
Scope: the extended electroporation corpus, 3,056 records
FieldPrimary sourceFallback ruleUnassigned
Study typePubMed publication type tagsCrossref and OpenAlex document type; then keyword rules over title and abstract41
Model systemMeSH headings (human, animal, cell line)Species and method expressions in title and abstract110
Mechanism termsTerm patterns over title, abstract and opening paragraphAt most six terms per record, ranked by frequency431

All labels are automatic: first the index's own field, and in its absence a rule set over title and abstract. Unassigned records are not hidden; they appear as “Not reported” in the tables. Document type and study design are held in separate fields (the preprint of a randomised study appears as both “Preprint” and “randomised”) and the counts are taken from the study type field. Document distribution: Journal Article 2,804 · Conference Abstract 98 · Editorial / Letter 75 · Protocol 31 · Preprint 21 · Correction / Erratum 14 · Thesis 11 · Technical Document 1 · Book Chapter 1.

Study-type bands. Scope: the oncology corpus, 2,820 records
BandStudy types it coversPublications
RCT · review · guidelineRandomized clinical trials, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, guidelines and consensus documents127
Clinical studyProspective, retrospective and unspecified clinical studies600
Case series · reportCase series and single case reports247
PreclinicalAnimal, in vitro, in silico and experimental biophysics studies1,314
Review · technical · otherNarrative reviews, technical and device papers, editorials, conference abstracts and records without an assigned study type532
The thresholds behind the area badges
Literature maturityThreshold
Broader clinical literatureAt least 15 clinical studies or case series and at least 1 strong publication
Early clinical literatureAt least 4 clinical studies or case series
Preclinical literatureAt least 5 preclinical publications
Exploratory literatureAreas meeting none of the thresholds above
The sets used in the thresholds
SetStudy types
Clinical study or case seriesCase Series, Clinical Study, Prospective Clinical Study, Randomized Clinical Trial, Retrospective Clinical Study
Strong publicationGuideline / Consensus, Randomized Clinical Trial, Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis
Preclinical publicationAnimal Study, Experimental Biophysics Study, In Silico / Modelling, In Vitro Study

A badge is computed for each (method, area) pair separately: within the same indication the electrochemotherapy and irreversible electroporation literatures can be at different stages. Case reports do not count towards the thresholds, so that a single case report cannot lift an area to a higher tier. The figure of 877 “clinical publications” above does include case reports.

How the corpus was assembled

The corpus is an archive of publications gathered by the team and filed by application area: each PDF in the archive corresponds to one record, its citation data resolved from external indexes and its labels assigned by rule. The archive holds 3,211 PDFs, of which 3,056 are counted as publications.

This is not a systematic review and was not conducted as one: there is no pre-registered protocol, no fixed search string, no locked date range and no two-reviewer screening flow. The portal therefore cannot publish a PRISMA flow diagram; doing so would describe a process that did not take place. What the archive covers and what it deliberately leaves out is set out in the table below.

Deliberately left outside the publication count
Archive setWhy it is not counted as a publicationDocuments
Regulatory and grey literatureApproval documents, adverse event records, health technology assessment reports and manufacturer instructions for use. They are not peer-reviewed journal publications and therefore do not enter the publication counts; their content is the subject of the safety and regulation page. The trial registry exports also sit in this folder and feed the trials table, but they are not counted as publications.56
Electrochemical ablation (EChT)A separate technology that drives an electrochemical reaction in tissue with direct current; applied on its own it involves no pulse that raises membrane permeability. The set also holds studies that combine electrolysis with electroporation pulses (E²); sitting on both sides of the boundary, they stay out of the corpus and are published on the neighbouring technologies page.37
Food, microbial and environmental PEFPulsed electric field in food processing, microbial control and environmental applications. This is electroporation but not a medical use, so it does not enter the portal's corpus. The publications are listed on the Neighbouring Technologies page.6
Thermal and other ablation methodsRadiofrequency, microwave, cryoablation and focused ultrasound. Tissue death is by heat or freezing rather than membrane permeabilisation, so they do not enter the electroporation literature. The publications are listed on the Neighbouring Technologies page.21
Intralesional chemotherapy without electroporationStudies in which the drug is injected directly into the lesion with no electric pulse. This is the comparison ground for electrochemotherapy but is not itself electroporation. The publications are listed on the Neighbouring Technologies page.10
Bioelectromagnetic fieldsStudies of low-voltage electric and magnetic fields. No pulse exceeding the membrane permeability threshold is applied, so this is not electroporation. The publications are listed on the Neighbouring Technologies page.11
BooksBooks and book scans. They cannot be counted as individual publication records and stay outside the corpus; book chapters filed with their own citation data do enter the corpus.2

Citation data is resolved from external indexes: 2,466 records through PubMed, 481 through Crossref and 91 through Europe PMC. 3,000 records carry a DOI and 2,536 a PubMed identifier. A further 10 records were entered by hand because no index held them. The overlap between archive and portal is audited on every build; if a document in the archive has no place in the portal, the build stops.

Known limitations of the corpus

Classification is automatic

Labels are assigned by rule and checked against the external indexes. Errors on individual records are to be expected, and aggregate counts carry the same margin.

Area assignment follows the filing

The area of a publication is determined by the folder it sits in, so a filing error turns directly into an area error.

A publication count is not a study count

The same study can enter the corpus as more than one record: a preprint and its final article, a conference version and the full publication, a translation, an article and its erratum. In the oncology corpus 55 records form 27 families, and in 15 of them the records are versions of the same study. The publication record count is 2,820; once those versions are deduplicated 2,804 independent studies remain. Every figure on these pages is a publication record count, while only one version of a family enters the threshold calculation.

The corpus is a snapshot

It covers only the publications that have entered the archive and stays as it is until the archive is updated.

Text extraction is not always clean

Where no abstract could be found in the indexes the text is extracted from the source PDF and can break. For 88 such records the text is not published; the citation data and source links remain. In 3 record the title stays cut short.

Registry data can be incomplete

The registry export carries no regime distinction: the field is empty on all 322 records. Enrolment and status fields can also be stale unless they are updated in the registry.

There is no outcome data

The portal counts publications; it reports no outcomes. Patient numbers, response rates, local control, survival, safety measures, comparator arms and risk-of-bias appraisal appear on no page. How many publications an area holds says nothing about how well the treatment works.

Language and access bias

Non-English literature, unindexed journals and studies whose full text was unavailable are systematically under-represented. This is not a systematic review protocol.

This is not a GRADE assessment. The tier names describe literature volume only: how many publications an area holds and which study types they fall into. They are not measures of response rate, survival, efficacy or safety; study quality and risk of bias have not been appraised. A badge does not indicate that a treatment is in clinical use, reimbursed, or approved by regulators. The thresholds are this portal's own definition and cannot be compared with the evidence gradings used elsewhere.

If you spot an error in a record, report it from that record's drawer in the library; the citation and identifier are added to the message automatically. For page-level errors write to info@dgmed.com.tr.

Publication span: 1986–2026 (extended electroporation corpus), 1988–2026 (oncology corpus). The datasets behind the tables on these pages can be downloaded: records, maturity matrix, mechanism distribution, application areas, trial registry, other registries, validation ledger.